Case Study

Part A . Ella Williams fixed on the assembly assembly channel at Toyota repel Manufacturing plant in Kentucky . She developed annoyance in her detention wrists , and arms and was diagnosed with impairments including wrist bone delve syndrome . Ms . Williams was reassigned to ii quality look into inspection jobs , except , when Toyota repulse Manufacturing added a third such quality control job , on that point was a dispute as to what happened next According to Ms . Williams her condition worsened and the fraternity refused a request by her for an accommodation , but tally to Toyota Motor Manufacturing the actor evidently began missing ferment on a regular stand Eventually , Ms . Williams authorized a letter from Toyota Motor Manufacturing that terminated her employment and cited an allegedly poor attendance degra de . Ms . Williams d a charge of dis cleverness contrast with the EEOC . After receiving a discipline to sue letter Ms . Williams d suit against Toyota Motor Manufacturing for having violated the adenosine deaminase and establish her view that she had a disability , for purposes of the adenosine deaminase , on some(prenominal) assertions , including one that her impairments intimately especial(a) her in the major put through performance of playing manual tasksClaiming to be disabled from acting her automobile assembly line job by carpal tunnel syndrome and related impairments , responder sued prayer , her former employer , for helplessness to provide her with a reasonable accommodation as necessary by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (adenosine deaminase . The District Court granted petitioner summary judgment , holding that respondent s impairment did non transfigure as a disability under the ADA because it had not substantially express any major feel activity , and that there was no evide! nce that respondent had had a phonograph recording of a substantially limiting impairment or that petitioner had regarded her as having such an impairment . The Sixth traffic merry-go-round reversed , finding that the impairments substantially limited respondent in the major life activity of performing manual tasks .

In to demonstrate that she was so limited , said the motor indian lodge , respondent had to show that her manual disability involved a relegate of manual activities affecting the ability to perform tasks at work . Respondent satisfied this test , according to the homage , because her ailments p revented her from doing the tasks associated with trusted types of manual jobs that require the gripping of tools and repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or to a higher place raise levels for extended periods of time . In reaching this determination , the court found that evidence that respondent could tend to her private hygiene and carry out personal or household chores did not affect a determination that her impairments substantially limited her ability to perform the range of manual tasks associated with assembly line jobPart B . The District Court found that Ella Williams did not fork out a disability , as defined by the ADA , at the time that the company allegedly refused to accommodate her , and patch the worker had a physical impairment , her asserting that she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks was irretrievably contradicted by her pressure sensation that she could perform some assembly and...If you necessity to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper