Comparative Criminal Justice

NameProfessorSchoolDateComparative Criminal Justice1 .One difference betwixt inquisitorial swear by(p) and common natural law sue is the representation of the aggrieved party . In common law process , the aggrieved party is substituted by the turn off in fashioning its accusations against the opponent (Levinson 260 . On the different go , in an inquisitorial , a public official takes the mail of the private accuser In addition , private party initiates an routine in common law small-arm inquisitorial is triggered by ex officio of the judicial system (Congleton 399Another difference is the procedure . Parties in common law argon represented by lawyers who atomic number 18 t petitioned to present their evidences applicable laws and legal theories while rebutting the evidences presented by the other party . Here , the try out plays a passive theatrical division by making sure alone that the procedures and rules of evidence are properly followed to experience fair trial (Levinson 260 . therefrom , the process is controlled by the party .

However , in inquisitorial , the judge asks questions to be answered by the lawyers of individually party . The judge whitethorn also ask for witnesses and more evidences to evaluate what transpired and eventually look for the truth . Hence , the process is controlled by the judge2 .The major differences between Common fairness and Civil Law Procedure are the roles played by the judge and t he judicial process . In common law the judg! e plays a passive role because his task is only(prenominal) to oversee the procedure and evidences presented by each party . In this procedure , the parties present the...If you want to loll around a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper