Thursday, December 20, 2018
'Politics and the English Language Answers Essay\r'
'In Orwellââ¬â¢s essay Politics and the slope Language, Orwell expresses his raw opinion on the worsening of the position dustup and how politics is a ca single-valued function for the ââ¬Å" faintheartedness and incompetenceââ¬Â that indite has succumbed too. though the title of the essay introduces politics prototypical and the English quarrel last, Orwellââ¬â¢s dissertation seems to consist of n both; it consists of the silliness of current mankind authorship. He states in the twinkling paragraph, ââ¬Å"It becomes vile and inaccurate beca handling our imaginations argon sappy, but the drippiness of our language makes it easier for us to experience foolish thoughts.ââ¬Â His thesis is a bountiful statement that engulfs the horrible habits of politicians who utilisation pre-made phrases that in the end lead to a passage that makes no sense at all. Orwell discusses his view on the English Language after he scrutinizes several passages that he intents as examples throughout the essay. With these examples, he explains the quality of penning that is apply commonly throughout authors using advanced English. From start to finish of his essay, Orwell analyzes the mistakes, bad habits, inability to express signification in writing pieces.\r\nOn page two, Orwell says, ââ¬Å"The writer either has a meaning and cannot express it, or he inadvertently says something else, or he is almost indifferent as to whether his delivery mean anything or not. This mixture of vagueness and abridge incompetence is the most marked property of late Englishââ¬Â¦Ã¢â¬Â Despite Orwellââ¬â¢s expression of the blackballs in writing today, he isnââ¬â¢t completely hopeless; for he gives solutions and tips on how to overcome poor writing habits. Throughout his explanation and argument, Orwell stresses the incompetence, vagueness, and carelessness in writing that is commonly employ in literary expositions. Orwell goes on to list planetary pr oblems with writing techniques and the appearance of meaning lucidness. First, he talks roughly the use of destruction metaphors. In this paragraph, Orwell explains that people use these demise metaphors ââ¬Å"because they save people from inventing phrases for themselves.ââ¬Â He analyzes the use of these metaphors and how some are sucked out of their accepted meanings without the writer noticing themselves; completely altering the meaning of the metaphor or textbook. Next, Orwell describes the use of ââ¬Å"verbal false limbs,ââ¬Â or the use of to a greater extent syllables in a sentence to array symmetry.\r\nHe notes that people use fancy, pre-made phrases to alternate simple conjunctions and prepositions to cushion their sentences. These pre-made phrases are used almost instantly and can dash the meaning and clarity a text almost indefinitely. Third, Orwell goes on slightly the use of pretentious enunciation used mainly by political, scientific, and sociologica l writers. Pretentious diction is explained to be the use of trendy, foreign phrases and newfangled wrangling to show culture and elegancy. except Orwell argues that these fancy phrases are ââ¬Å"an increase in slovenliness and vaguenessââ¬Â in writing. Lastly, Orwell talks about the abuse of meaningless quarrel. He explains that writers whitethorn use a word has unrivalled meaning, but they use it in a text dish starstly with their own person-to-person definition. These poor habits of writing are seen endlessly and exemplify the demise of the English Language. Orwellââ¬â¢s issues are valid because the vagueness and meaningless texts are examples of the habits and mind of the writer. its because of the poor writing habits that Orwell says, ââ¬Å"it consists in gumming together prospicient strips of lecture which take for already been set in order by someone else, fashioning the results pass onable by sheer humbug.ââ¬Â\r\nOverall, Orwell explains the negative a spects of writing and writing habits in the modern English Language. However, Orwell remains hopeful about the improvement and changes of writing. Throughout his essay, Orwell continuously stresses the deadening of the English Language and the vagueness and meaninglessness modern literacy. He presents six questions that every writer should ask themselves while writing: ââ¬Å"What am I trying to say? What words will express it? What flesh or idiom will make it well-defineder? Is this image fresh enough to have an entrap?ââ¬Â¦Could I put it much abruptly? Have I said anything that is avoidably nauseous?ââ¬Â Not only does he present these questions writing, he gives six quick tips to germinate bad habits in writing. He explains that writers should never use any type of metaphoric speech that is seen regularly in print, should use short words or else of long words, for writers to throw out useless words, to use the active if you can replace the still and to use everyday English instead of foreign phrases or scientific words. As Orwellââ¬â¢s last tip, he says ââ¬Å" extravasate any of these rules sooner than say anything at once barbarous.ââ¬Â\r\nOrwell feels that breaking poor writing habits and followers these tricks will exit anyone to achieve outstanding and effloresce writing. ââ¬Å"The great enemy of clear language is insincerity.ââ¬Â (59) Orwell displays several different passages in his text that are unclear and vague to even the writer. By being unclear, one can falsify the meaning of their writing, making it insincere. This quote from Orwellââ¬â¢s essay is a prime example of why clarity is so important in writing, oddly for politicians who often use pre-made phrases, assuring vagueness and red of meaning. Orwell writes in his essay, ââ¬Å"ââ¬Â¦ready-made phrasesââ¬Â¦will work out the important service of partially concealing your meaning even from yourself.ââ¬Â This quote explains how important it is to be clear in writing the English Language so that words written are truthful and clear to the read and to the writer themselves.\r\nââ¬Å"But if thought despoils language, language can also corrupt thought.ââ¬Â (59) Orwellââ¬â¢s quote about thoughts and language corrupting each other brings us back to the thesis of his essay: ââ¬Å"it becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.ââ¬Â Through these two quotes, Orwell expresses that the deterioration of the English language and of the writing skills makes it easier for us have corrupt our minds with ugly thoughts. These ugly thoughts allow us to have corrupt language; making it both language and our human thoughts to blame. The yearlong we use poor language, the easier and fast it will get stuck in our minds and thoughts. The longer these ill habits of writing are imprinted in our minds, the easier it is to have foolish thou ghts to cause more corrupt writing.\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment