'12 Angry Men – the Definition of a Leader Essay\r'

'Yvette Perkins MBA-6620/Paper 1 The translation of a leader can be evince in many ways. In reference to the celluloid 12 Angry Men, I have go to agree with the quote of our sixth President posterior Quincy Adams which states â€Å"if your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more, and scram more, you ar a leader. ” (Smith, 14) In this movie the main(prenominal) character Davis played by Henry Fonda was fitting to influence 11 other jurors by introducing the model of possibility. Davis exemplified leadership by dint of his behavior, intellection, and communication skills in his efforts to sway the other jurors.\r\nTo begin, Davis’ behavior displayed positive energy passim the entire movie. Upon entering the room he remained dim and observant of the other jurors. From our discussion packet I have conditioned an important success secret, which is to be â€Å"quick to listen, slow to speak, slow to anger. ” (Smith, 31) This method tu rn out to be meaningful through his actions. He was adequate to(p) to keep his composure during the arguments of the jurors. In order to pay back an effective leader, your passion, confidence, and determination must be verbalised through your body language, as did Davis.\r\nIn appurtenance to that, I have come to learn that â€Å" believeing is the deliberate exploration of experience for a intention. ” (Smith, 3) In my opinion, Davis followed the trinity thinking model. In pursuit of his purpose he utilise direction by petition the other juror â€Å"is it possible”. He used perception by being observant of his purlieu and the others that surrounded him. Finally, he used lateral thinking by assessing the possibilities. Davis stood by his assumption that there was sightly doubt in his mind.\r\nI believe that he saw the grounds as â€Å"EBNE”, it was excellent grouch not enough. (Smith, 7) In his exploration of possibilities he took the approach shot o f two Greek philosophers. One was Socrates and the approach through question and two Aristotle the approach through loge logic. In this case Davis thought outside the box. pass away but not least, communication skills are of import to becoming an effective leader. As we have learned from our discussion on how the brain flows into perception, people are happy with stability and are reluctant to channelize their ways.\r\nWell, in the movie some jurors were reluctant to deepen their perception of the case, which we also know as â€Å"blocked by openness”. (Smith, 19) Davis try’s to repugn their perception by using, manipulating, and managing the facts presented in the case. By asking questions he was able to uncover insights and new evidence which lead to the other jurors changing their votes from guilty to not guilty. To conclude, â€Å"It is what you cause to happen in the mind of a listener that makes you interesting”. Smith, 19) I truly believe that the hardest obstacle of life is getting people to think what you think and fighting human nature. However, Davis has showed us that it is possible. tally to the five stages of thinking from the packet, the stage of possibility is the productive stage. This stage is where we create possible solutions and approaches. My definition of a leader is someone who analyzes information, challenge the facts, and initiates change; which was show by Henry Fonda in the movie 12 Angry Men.\r\n'